SA Import Beta 2000 Coupe

[peteracs]

MOT ?...Do you need one for a Classic car or are you just wanting the assurance ?

As Tim says a good check on your work (or anyone else's which is as important). Case in point was my car ran really well and the brakes were really good, so would not have checked them without the MOT guy commenting on the fronts dragging slightly. Not enough to fail, but not as he would have expected. On checking I found a weeping out of the front piston vent hole which indicated a weeping seal. Without the MOT brake test I would never have known and may have led to excessive brake wear and overheating perhaps.

Peter

[SanRemo78]

Plus one for the annual test, peace of mind that someone else can have. look over it and identify any wear that comes in gradually that you don't notice driving the car until it's too late. Insurance is another issue, prove it was maintained properly in the event of a claim? MOT history is a good starting point. Interestingly, although the Stratos replica is registered as a Historic Vehicle the mere fact that it's a kit (or a Radically Altered Vehicle) means MOT tests forever....
Guy

[Nigel]

I'm another that does annual MOT's.

In a previous year the tester found a rack boot split. I told
him I'd not have spotted that for quite a while.

As said already, although the MOT is just a snap-shot, it will
demonstrate vehicle care and upkeep to officialdom.

N.

[peteracs]

I actually take the view that every two years is sufficient given the mileage I do.

Peter

[deks]

My view is if you have to start worrying about the cost, then you should not do it

This is advice I am keen to read and think maybe I need heed.